xena wild

The text you've provided includes a detailed forum discussion regarding a disputed financial transaction for a service that was allegedly not delivered, with angry and abusive messages exchanged between the parties. The text explicitly suggests fraudulent activity in the following ways:

1. Non-Refunded Deposit – Deception for Financial Gain:
- The core allegation made by the original poster (OP) is that a service provider, "Xena Wild / Larissa Selvaggia," accepted a deposit of €150 for a session but failed to provide the service. The OP asserts that:
> “She took 150€ deposit. The day of session she cancelled… She didn’t come… She stopped answering several messages from me.”
- These statements indicate a breach of an agreement: payment was received, the service was not rendered, and communication ceased when a refund was requested. That behavior may constitute deception for financial gain and is the basis of the user’s claim of being "cheated."

2. Pattern of Avoidance:
- The accused individual allegedly provided vague excuses and ultimately became non-responsive:
> “Told me of problems with PayPal… Sent her my bank account data but she stopped answering several messages from me.”
- This pattern is consistent with common fraudulent tactics: claiming difficulty processing refunds and then ceasing contact.

3. Aggressive and Intimidating Communication:
- A portion of the WhatsApp messages posted are from the accused (Xena Wild / Larissa Selvaggia), in response to continued requests for a refund. Sample excerpts include:
> “I’m not even afraid of the devil… I’ll slam your shitty face into the ground… apologize otherwise I won’t send you shit.”
- This contains multiple threats, profanities, and refusals to refund unless the customer apologizes, suggesting a coercive strategy rather than a legitimate business dispute resolution.

4. Accusations of a Scam:
- The language used by the OP directly labels the service provider as a scammer:
> “...this girl is not only stealing money but also uses the worst swear words and threatens me…”

> “...some scammers... should realize that not everything is without consequence.”
- Further, another forum participant notes:
> “She is listed as a Scammer on Sessiongirls...”
- If true, the label of "scammer" on a third-party professional directory implies a pattern of behavior, not an isolated incident.

5. Disappearance From Platforms – Evasion Tactic:
- The original poster provides further evidence that suggests an effort to avoid accountability:
> “No more sessiongirl profile, cell phone No. and email address down, HP down, most of wrestling activities in internet gone.”
- This kind of online disappearance following a dispute could be interpreted as intent to evade refund responsibilities or accountability, potentially reinforcing the conclusion of fraudulent intent.

Summary:
The text describes fraudulent activity by alleging that a deposit was taken with no intention of rendering the agreed-upon service, followed by evasion, threats, and refusal to return the money. The pattern of behaviors — accepting funds and failing to deliver services, avoiding refund requests, issuing threats, and disappearing from online platforms — are consistent with intentionally deceptive and exploitative conduct for financial gain.