Back to Scammers List

Tatianna Butler

Headline Summary: Multiple users allege that Tatianna Butler engaged in deceptive practices for financial gain, including accepting deposits for sessions that were never fulfilled, cutting paid sessions short while keeping full payment, and failing to deliver promised goods or reimbursements.

Last Updated: January 22, 2026

Sources:

https://saradas.org/index.php?topic=61373.0
https://saradas.org/index.php?topic=380078.0

Review

The text contains multiple explicit descriptions of potentially fraudulent activities, particularly actions that can be classified as scams or deception for financial gain. Here are the key examples where fraudulent conduct is evident:

  1. Taking Money Without Providing Services:

    • A poster describes how they sent a deposit to Tatianna Butler to secure a session in London, but she never showed up. Later, when they followed up to arrange a new session in New York, she claimed the previous payment was to help with her financial issues and would not be applied to a future session. This is a classic example of taking a deposit under false pretenses, which constitutes fraud.
    • Quote: “She said that the deposit for the London trip was to help her with her financial issues, so if we were to have a session she would need to be paid.” This reflects a clear case of deceptive financial conduct.

  2. Charging Full Payment for Incomplete or Aborted Sessions:

    • Another individual reports paying a full fee for a session that ended after 10 minutes, with the provider claiming the client "smelled bad.” Although promised DVDs as a form of compensation, they were never sent.
    • Quote: “She quitted the session soon after about 10 minutes, but claimed the full fee … promised to send me three of her DVD's… but then I never got anything from her.” This suggests breach of agreement and failure to deliver or refund, potentially constituting theft or fraud.

  3. Repeated Negative Reviews Indicating a Pattern:

    • There is a recurring theme throughout the text where various individuals share experiences indicating the provider frequently cancels sessions, is inattentive, unprofessional, or does not fulfill the services as agreed upon. While this alone is not proof of fraud, when combined with credible claims of taking money without service or reneging on agreements, it supports a pattern consistent with scam behavior.

  4. Borrowing Money Without Repayment:

    • One statement claims: “Borrows money and never pays it back – I'm the idiot who tried to help her out but she's dishonest…” While more anecdotal, this allegation points to financial deceit.

In summary, the text contains several explicit references to behavior that qualifies as fraudulent, including accepting payment without providing the promised service, keeping deposits under misleading pretenses, and failing to honor agreements. These behaviors meet common definitions of deception and misrepresentation for financial gain.