Back to Scammers List

rose risque

West Lafayette, Indiana, United States

Individual accused of running repeated scams by selling custom videos that were never delivered, reusing pre-recorded content, and soliciting payments under false pretenses.

Last Updated: May 05, 2025

Review

The text explicitly describes fraudulent activity through multiple references to deceptive practices involving monetary transactions. Several key elements that illustrate fraud include:

1. Deception for Financial Gain

  • Users report paying money for "custom videos" or sessions that were either not delivered or turned out to be re-used or misrepresented content. Selling pre-recorded videos while advertising them as custom-made and charging a premium falsely represents the product and constitutes deception.

"You think it’s ok to advertise a pre-recorded video as a 'custom' while charging $45 more, to those unfortunate enough to not know better?"

  • There is also mention of deposits being taken for services that were never rendered.

"Yep, I was scammed asked for a few videos, sent a few dollars... also scammed by her sister."

"Moxie Mayhem stole my deposit about 10 years ago..."

2. Pattern and Intent

  • The repetition of similar complaints from different users about similar experiences points toward a deliberate pattern rather than isolated mistakes. Several users mention being defrauded by someone using the same methods (e.g., upfront payment, no delivery, reused content, same contact/email).

"She proceeded to insult me and even tried to scam another guy THE NEXT DAY after I caught her in the act."

"She’s back and trying to go under another name... Same scam prices, same scam methods"

"There was proof it was her trying to scam."

3. Illegal Sale of Content

  • A user claims the individual sold content that they did not have legal rights to distribute — a form of intellectual property infringement and potential theft:

"...she does need to stop selling your content illegally..."

4. Lack of Delivery and Use of Aliases

  • Mention of the person operating under different names or impersonating others reinforces the accusation of intentional deception.

"Might be a guy impersonating a woman."

"She’s back and trying to go under another name..."


Conclusion:
The text explicitly describes fraudulent activity mainly in the form of (1) deceptive sales practices, (2) charging money for goods or services that are never provided or misrepresented, and (3) unauthorized sale of content. These actions — when done deliberately — meet the common definition of a scam or fraud: obtaining money from others through deceptive means. The repeated nature and deceit involved indicate it is not a random mistake but rather intentional conduct aimed at financial gain.