Back to Scammers List

Miriam Magic AKA Alesya Muscledoll AKA Elisabeta Ionita

The text explicitly describes fraudulent activity by detailing a series of deliberate deceptions—such as using multiple false identities and soliciting advance payments for fake services—that led victims to send money via Western Union without receiving the promised sessions, constituting a financial scam.

Last Updated: May 29, 2025

Review

The text you provided is an exchange from a public forum or message board and describes allegations of fraudulent behavior involving an individual using the alias "Alesya Muscledoll." The post and subsequent replies contain detailed reports from various users asserting that they were victims of a scam.

Here is how this text explicitly describes fraudulent activity:


1. Deception for Financial Gain

Multiple individuals describe a scheme in which they were deceived by someone allegedly posing as a female bodybuilder using various pseudonyms—such as Alesya Muscledoll, Miriam Magic, Liliann Sun, etc.—to solicit advance payments (deposits) for services (such as in-person sessions or video chats) that were never delivered.

“She said me, that she will came to Berlin if I pay 200 EU. 50% advance and 50% at the meeting in Berlin.”

“So First I would need to send 100 euros via Western Union to the Person with the name ‘Marius Mitrache’ to Romania.”

“Now she tell me, that she can not return me the money and I need to wait between March...than we can meet.”

These quotes illustrate explicitly deceptive behavior: a promise of services in exchange for payment that were not fulfilled and a demand for additional funds under false pretenses.


2. Use of False Identities (Impersonation)

The scam involves use of multiple aliases and possibly stolen photos or fabricated profiles, indicating that the person behind the scam created fictional identities or impersonated someone else for the purpose of defrauding others.

“At this time she had the Name ‘Musclelady’ from Hungary...than she change it into Muscledoll from Romania and now the actual name is ALEYSIA MUSCLEDOLL from Moldavia.”

“Actually I understand, that ‘Muscledoll’ or ‘Musclelady’ ... is a fake and I had talk from beginning with ‘Marius Mitrache’ from Romania.”

“She is a FAKE!!!!!!”

Creating fake profiles, or assuming another person’s persona for financial gain, is a key indicator of fraud.


3. Conspiracy and Repeated Offending

Several participants in the discussion mention that this is a repeated pattern with alleged involvement from an individual named Marius Mitrache.

“95% that ‘Miriam Magic’ who recently posted a profile on Sessiongirls.com is the same scumbag that already tried under ‘Muscle Diamond’ and latter ‘Alesya Muscle Doll.’”

“Two of his recent scam profiles have been deleted on Sessiongirls.com but he's already replaced them with new ones.”

This supports that the scam is not isolated but rather a systematic effort by the individual(s) involved to continue deceiving new targets.


4. Theft and Refusal to Refund Money

Victims consistently say they sent money through services like Western Union or PayPal and never received the promised services or any refund.

“I was so naive and have believe ‘ALEYSIA MUSCLEDOLL’... Now I lost 100 euros. It is of course my fault.”

“She can not return me the money and I need to wait between March... then we can meet.”

“Scammer Marius Mitrache continues and more of his sort will follow.”

The refusal to return funds and the continued solicitation of deposits despite not delivering on previous promises constitutes theft under the guise of a business transaction.


5. Obstruction of Transparency and Reporting

Several users report that reviews exposing the scammer are being systematically deleted:

“If you want, you can write also in review, that she is a fake. But she (or better he) will delate this review.”

“Every day I write the same review and he delete it again... it’s a funny fight... without ending.”

This demonstrates an apparent attempt to hide fraudulent behavior by removing user-submitted complaints or warnings.


Conclusion:

This text explicitly describes fraudulent activity in several ways:

  • Deceiving victims into sending money in exchange for services that are not rendered
  • Using aliases or impersonating others to facilitate this deception
  • Repeatedly setting up new scam profiles to continue the fraud
  • Refusing to refund payments
  • Deleting reviews that expose the fraudulent behavior

If accurate, this conduct would qualify not just as unethical but potentially criminal, involving wire fraud, identity fraud, and theft by deception.