Individual accuses service provider of deceptive practices by collecting deposits for appointments she repeatedly cancels or misses without issuing refunds, suggesting a pattern of financial fraud.
Last Updated: May 29, 2025
The text explicitly describes fraudulent activity through multiple elements that point to deception for financial gain and intentional scams:
Payment of a Deposit Without Receiving the Service:
The writer reports paying a deposit after a session was agreed upon and confirmed. However, the session was canceled or delayed without fulfillment, and a refund was not provided. This constitutes financial loss due to a false promise of service, which is a key indicator of fraud.
Pattern of Similar Complaints:
The text refers to another similar incident in Zurich, suggesting that this behavior is not isolated. This pattern supports the idea of an intentional scheme to collect deposits without providing the promised service.
Failure to Communicate or Provide Evidence of Service:
The writer casts doubt on whether the person even visited Vienna as claimed, supported by input from others who did not see her there. This implies deceptive statements about availability to justify collecting money from clients.
Absence of Refunds:
The refusal or failure to refund the deposit after canceling the session reinforces the characterization of fraudulent behavior, especially when paired with the expectation (based on prior knowledge) that the money would not be returned.
Warning to Others:
The poster directly warns others not to pay in advance, indicating they believe this is a deliberate scam tactic. This highlights perceived intentional wrongdoing rather than accidental miscommunication.
These elements collectively support the conclusion that the text is describing fraudulent conduct involving deception for financial gain through the collection of deposits under false pretenses with no intention or follow-through of delivering services.