mighty_shehulk

Here is an explicit analysis of the given text for evidence of fraudulent activity (such as deception for financial gain, theft, or intentional scams):

Direct Accusations & Description of Fraud (Theft/Scams):

• The most explicit example of fraud in the text is in the later part, where a user describes their personal experience:

I am extremely disappointed in Michelle Dornon (Mighty She Hulk). She pushed her cancellation problems on me and now I am out $730. ... I am out $730 with no session. Michelle offered me a session in the future when she comes back to Dallas. I reminded her that she is retiring and that she said nobody in Dallas is booking her. She offered that I fly to Vegas. Frankly I was so disappointed and upset I was done. To be fair to Michelle, she was not the only lady to take my money and provide nothing. Unfortunately this is becoming a big problem in the industry. If you want to book with Michelle I recommend you get all details upfront, including hotel location.

Here, a clear pattern is described: The user alleges they paid $730 (covering session and hotel), but did not receive the session. The service provider (Michelle/Mighty She Hulk) allegedly made excuses (such as needing to change times and locations, citing travel/retirement, alleged financial distress), but ultimately did not deliver the paid-for service and refused effective remedy (like a refund). This is alleged theft by deception—a classic scam: taking money and not providing the service, especially after repeated evasion and shifting responsibility.

• Further support is provided:

To be perfectly fair, I've had 5 or 6 instances of people who returned my deposit when they had to cancel on their end. So there is still plenty of honor among people doing this. I've done session since 2009. I'll just consider the 2 times people have outright stolen a deposit from me the cost of doing this hobby...It's just disappointing people who we "admire" act this way.

Here, "outright stole a deposit" is explicit language describing intentional theft/fraud.

Discussion of Broader Pattern:

• Multiple posters discuss how scams occur in this niche:

So a number of them, when presented with an opportunity, take the money and run without much regard for the person on the other end.

• And:

If it's a scammer collects deposits and deactivates link. Dozens of guys scammed because of sessiongirls website

Again, there is an explicit claim that scam artists collect deposits and then disable their accounts, disappearing with the money—classical internet fraud.

Deception:

• Some remarks address misleading/fake reviews:

As we know most of these reviews are fake and manipulated even some of them written by themselves.

This references deceptive practices, potentially designed to create a false sense of credibility and lure more victims.

Summary:

The text contains multiple explicit descriptions/accusations of fraudulent activity, namely:

• Taking deposits/payment for a service (session) and then making excuses, canceling, and refusing to provide the service or refund—meeting the criteria for theft by deception or an intentional scam.
• Reports that this is not an isolated incident but part of a wider pattern within this industry/scene, and that scammers use tactics such as fake reviews and disappearing accounts to continue their fraud.
• References to fake reviews and manipulation, which are methods of deception, designed to make fraudulent schemes appear legitimate.

Thus, the text describes fraudulent activity, especially theft of deposits and services not being rendered, as well as broader practices of deception for financial gain.