The text contains multiple explicit descriptions of behavior that can be characterized as fraudulent, particularly through the lens of deception for financial gain and intentional scams. Here's how:
1. Pattern of Taking Money Without Providing the Service (Theft/Fraud)
- Multiple users report sending full payment or deposits to an individual named Kelly Winterss for scheduled private sessions or appointments.
- In several cases, sessions were canceled or rescheduled by Kelly, often at the last minute.
- Despite promises to refund, no refund was issued in many instances, even after extended periods (up to a year) had passed.
- Some individuals report that she did not respond to follow-ups or communication ceased altogether, leaving clients out of pocket.
This behavior aligns with the legal and definitional understanding of fraudulent activity—specifically, soliciting money under false pretenses and failing to deliver or refund the promised service.
2. Examples of Deception and Broken Agreements
- "She then changed the time at the last minute... promised to send the full amount back... that was over a year ago."
- "She recently came to the area... we had an appointment... she flaked on me again."
- "She refuses to refund the deposit. No mention of rescheduling at a later date."
These statements indicate intentional deception or negligence with financial consequences, leading to losses on the part of the client.
3. Exploitation of Goodwill and Excuses
- Reference to personal hardships and a GoFundMe page is mentioned, suggesting that the individual may have been using emotional appeals or personal struggles to justify not returning funds.
- While difficult life circumstances are not crimes, using them as a shield after receiving and failing to return money could suggest manipulative behavior aimed at deflecting accountability for financial misconduct.
4. Admission of Negative Pattern and Account Suspension
- Users point out that her profile was suspended, likely due to multiple complaints, and even mention that SessionGirls intervened in at least one case to recover a deposit.
- This highlights that the issue is serious and recurring, reinforcing suspicion of fraudulent activity.
5. Community Warnings and Loss of Trust
- Several reviewers warn others to not send deposits or full payments, citing direct personal experiences of financial loss.
- The widespread nature of these warnings suggests a pattern of behavior rather than isolated incidents.
Conclusion:
The text explicitly outlines fraudulent conduct involving accepting payments for services not rendered, repeated cancellation with no refund, and lack of communication. These actions constitute deception for financial gain and can reasonably be interpreted as intentional scams or theft, particularly given the repeated behavior and failure to rectify the situation without the intervention of third parties.