Sao Paulo, , Brazil
**Headline Summary of Fraudulent Activity:** Website admin alleges Carla Inhaia and her husband orchestrated a $2,700 travel reimbursement scam—accepting funds for international trip expenses under false pretenses and refusing repayment—despite promises, intimidation tactics, and evasion, prompting PayPal disputes and legal complaints.
Last Updated: May 29, 2025
The text contains multiple explicit descriptions of alleged fraudulent activity, including elements of deception, unfulfilled financial obligations, and accusations of intentional scams. Here's a breakdown of how the text demonstrates potentially fraudulent behavior:
“She Scammed us about $2400 (we advance the money for her and husband to travel plus hotel). She never wanted to refund."
This sentence alleges that Carla Inhaia and her husband received advance payments under an agreement (to travel for services or work) and did not fulfill their side of the deal or return the funds. Keeping funds that are contractually required to be refunded could constitute theft by deception or contract fraud.
“Once they arrived in London, they start saying we owe them copyright for image.... Therefore they didn't refund the money..."
This quote suggests they used copyright claims as a pretext to avoid repayment, which could reflect an intent to deceive or manipulate the financial agreement.
“They make full pression to get the money via paypal.. ($1800) and $900 via western union..."
Obtaining money through multiple untraceable payment platforms (especially Western Union, often used in scams due to its lack of buyer/seller protection) raises red flags of potential scam structures aimed at avoiding accountability.
“...then nothing happens, they blocked me on Whatsapp..."
Cutting off communication after receiving money is a common tactic in scams to avoid follow-up or accountability.
“Her husband started to be threatening... saying he wanted to fight and invited me to go in London."
This alleged behavior could be considered intimidation, possibly to suppress a complaint or coerce someone into silence—which is sometimes associated with scammers protecting fraudulent operations.
“...some others couldn't travel and we couldn't help others...”
The author claims the loss of funds affected other legitimate business operations and individuals, showing financial harm caused by unfulfilled arrangements—a key consequence of fraud.
“They finally (her and husband) agreed for a solution which was releasing the videos on Fanswise and for us to keep the money for the refund."
This implies that a compromise was reached after pressure from third parties and doesn’t negate the original accusation that money was initially taken under false terms.
The post describes acts that align with fraudulent intent, including:
- Acceptance of funds under an agreement with no intent to deliver.
- Using fabricated or unrelated claims (copyright) to justify withholding money.
- Cutting off communication after receiving payment.
- Financial harm caused to the payor and others relying on those funds.
- Use of threats to avoid liability or silence the accuser.
While the person accused (Carla Inhaia) denies the scam and offers a rebuttal, from the perspective of the original complaint, these are clear descriptions of alleged fraud for financial gain through deceptive means.