**Allegations Claim Fitness Coach Alyssa Kiessling Scammed Clients by Taking Payment for Coaching Services and Failing to Deliver, with Multiple Victims Reporting Similar Financial Deception.**
Last Updated: May 29, 2025
The text you provided explicitly describes alleged fraudulent activity in several ways. Here’s a breakdown of how the text indicates deception for financial gain, which constitutes fraud:
Multiple statements in the text accuse Alyssa Kiessling of accepting money for services (including fitness coaching, posing sessions, and competition preparation) and then failing to deliver those services:
“I got burned and lost $450 that I paid her up front… I Paid for a routine and 8 posing sessions.”
“She missed one session entirely… still had sessions left that I paid for.”
“Finally I ask for my money back this morning for ONLY the 3 sessions we didn’t do…”
“She scammed me out of $450.”
These claims, if true, indicate that the person took funds under the pretense of providing a service and then did not fulfill that obligation. This behavior falls under deceptive business practices and theft by deception, which are considered fraudulent.
The text mentions:
“I received multiple messages from other girls/guys about her doing the same thing to them. 2 of which were her prep clients…”
“I heard from some other girls that Alyssa Kiessling did the same thing to dozens of amateur competitors.”
This suggests a repeated action of obtaining money through false pretenses, which implies intentional fraud or scam behavior as opposed to a one-time misunderstanding or mistake.
“Ask for my money back… she responds instantly with this ridiculous message.”
This shows that the person allegedly avoided communication until confronted about the payment, strengthening the argument that the initial intent may have been intentional deception, not just poor service.
“You should report Alyssa Kiessling’s scam to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)… It is a crime to solicit money from someone only to not deliver a product or service you promised them.”
This part reinforces that the described actions are viewed as criminal behavior under fraud laws, particularly highlighting that offering services and failing to deliver them after receiving payment is classified as a scam.
Repeated use of the words “scam,” “scammer,” and “fraudulent” throughout the piece suggests that the behavior crosses from unethical into explicitly illegal conduct:
“Highly unprofessional. Highly untrustworthy. Highly delusional. Do NOT give this girl your money…”
“Thanks for your post Olivia. People should be aware of Alyssa Kiessling’s scam.”
“When will she refund their money? Guess what? This scammer… blocked me immediately.”
This demonstrates the writer’s belief that the behavior isn’t merely unprofessional, but fits the legal and common definitions of fraud.
Conclusion:
The text explicitly describes fraudulent activity by alleging that Alyssa Kiessling accepted payment for services she did not fully deliver, repeated this behavior with multiple clients, and avoided accountability. These actions, if accurate, constitute deceptive practices for financial gain — a core element of fraud.